If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile. These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby. It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health. The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue. But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. safe distance to live from cell phone tower could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer. Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further your location from the tower. Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas. This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues. This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues). https://smed-mcgowan.mdwrite.net/very-best-minimum-acceptable-range-between-yourself-and-a-5g-mobile-structure is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines. Additionally, what is a safe distance from a cell tower and FCC limit their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower|https://smed-mcgowan.mdwrite.net/very-best-minimum-acceptable-range-between-yourself-and-a-5g-mobile-structure|what is a safe distance from a cell tower
