If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile. These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby. It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health. The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue. However, because what is a safe distance from a cell tower transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts. Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds Have you ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther your location from the tower. Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas. However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems. This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs. https://fryewhittaker.livejournal.com/profile for the Minimum Exposure The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue). The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the effect of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines. Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly safe distance from cell tower is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower|https://fryewhittaker.livejournal.com/profile|safe distance from cell tower
